It was a single and then Heron updated the chair in 1953. When Disney was replaced with a detach in 2000, I ended up with Chair 54 that proudly sits in my family room.
Reliability has nothing to do with it. Bottom Drive/ Bottom tension lifts are a little less efficient than a Top Drive bottom tension lift. They require more tension which usually means a bigger haulrope and cost a little more. The main reason in Sugar Bowls case is the cost of bringing a power line to the top of the lift, that’s super expensive!!
Hiking up from the nearby Oakland Ski Club I stumbled into the parking lot side terminal of the Village Lift. Didn’t cross any “do not enter” signs so I checked it out. I love how Sugar Bowl has left parts of old chairs as memories of the past.
Thoughts on replacing Mt. Judah Express + Summit with a chair that has an angled midstation like Treeline Cirque at Alpine meadows to reliably run that terrain more?
Anyone know where they got what appears to be a Yan HSQ liftshack from?
Its underneath the Mt Judah express, and when I asked a ski patroller, and he said that they just use it as a terrain park storage building. They call it the “Vader Shack”
Lift Blog 
Any photos of the Silverbelt Yan quad?
LikeLike
Note the an SLI drive station in the background
LikeLike
Why is there a SLI drive terminal there?
LikeLike
It was the former Mt Lincoln 2 lift. It was replaced by the Silverbelt Quad.
LikeLike
Any chance we can get some stats on Summit? Looks like an interesting little lift.
LikeLike
Why did the Heron gondola have such a low capacity? Was it a pulse gondola, or did it not have many cabins?
LikeLike
It was a bicable gondola that only had 12 cabins:
It was upgraded in 1957 (not 1958) with 36 cabins:
LikeLiked by 1 person
from pictures i have seen, i do believe there was a single chair here at one point
LikeLike
A 1939 Riblet. One tower still stands.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I think that was one of the Heron doubles, not a Riblet single. The first pic shows it near a lift that replaced a Heron double.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a single and then Heron updated the chair in 1953. When Disney was replaced with a detach in 2000, I ended up with Chair 54 that proudly sits in my family room.
LikeLike
Why would a resort want to opt for mostly Bottom Drive/Top Tension lifts? Aren’t they the least reliable lifts?
LikeLike
Reliability has nothing to do with it. Bottom Drive/ Bottom tension lifts are a little less efficient than a Top Drive bottom tension lift. They require more tension which usually means a bigger haulrope and cost a little more. The main reason in Sugar Bowls case is the cost of bringing a power line to the top of the lift, that’s super expensive!!
LikeLike
Why was the Meadow Double removed without replacement?
LikeLike
It appears to have been replaced with a carpet lift.
Click to access 1574138451.pdf
LikeLike
Hiking up from the nearby Oakland Ski Club I stumbled into the parking lot side terminal of the Village Lift. Didn’t cross any “do not enter” signs so I checked it out. I love how Sugar Bowl has left parts of old chairs as memories of the past.
LikeLike
One of the old riblet doubles that was here https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/11124/9541/R1241.jpg?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
LikeLike
Good photo of one of the old doubles (with SLI chairs):
LikeLike
Thoughts on replacing Mt. Judah Express + Summit with a chair that has an angled midstation like Treeline Cirque at Alpine meadows to reliably run that terrain more?
LikeLike
I think the setup is fine as is, having to go all the way down to the base area to lap the terrain would be pretty annoying
LikeLike
Anyone know where they got what appears to be a Yan HSQ liftshack from?
Its underneath the Mt Judah express, and when I asked a ski patroller, and he said that they just use it as a terrain park storage building. They call it the “Vader Shack”
LikeLike