29 thoughts on “2 – Loveland, CO

  1. ACA Allertor's avatar ACA Allertor May 17, 2017 / 1:10 pm

    When they replaced the back rests Where did the yan metal ones come from?

    Like

  2. Jeff Lynne's avatar Jeff Lynne September 13, 2017 / 1:06 pm

    Why are the grips on this lift so dangerous?

    Like

    • Max Hart's avatar Max Hart September 13, 2017 / 4:57 pm

      They weren’t. Yans fixed grips were fine. Yan’s detachable grips were the dangerous ones because of poor design and insufficient clamping force.

      Like

      • Jeff Lynne's avatar Jeff Lynne September 23, 2017 / 12:41 pm

        I remember reading on Skilifts.org that chair 2 at Loveland is the only remaining lift with this type of Yan fixed grip, and that it is dangerous.

        Like

        • Peter Landsman's avatar Peter Landsman September 23, 2017 / 1:22 pm

          Though rare, I’m confident the Colorado Passenger Tramway Safety Board wouldn’t allow the Yan Type 6 grip in Colorado if thought to be unsafe.

          Like

      • Eric Drissell's avatar Eric Drissell February 7, 2018 / 8:41 pm

        I haven’t heard of Yan fixed grips having any dangerous issues, but I do know a lot of resorts that still run Yan/LE fixed grips have had them retrofitted by Doppelmayr or Poma with their grips…

        Like

  3. Jonathan's avatar Jonathan January 26, 2018 / 9:35 am

    The director of lifts there works for the Tramway safety board, so I am sure there is not type 6 grips

    Like

  4. Max Hart's avatar Max Hart February 7, 2018 / 8:57 pm

    This lift was from 1985, so it’s from the right era.
    Here are some official drawings of the Type-6 grips that I found a a few years ago:


    ( https://www.google.com/patents/US4658733?dq=ininventor:%22Jan+K.+Kunczynski%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiVsai1tZXZAhVjpVkKHZ17Azw4ChDoAQgoMAA )
    And here’s a 1988 Yan Quad that for sure has them: https://www.remontees-mecaniques.net/bdd/reportage-tsf4-quadruple-yan-lift-engineering-5351.html

    Upon closer examination of picture No. 5, these look like they are Type-6 grips. They are attached to the hanger arm the same way shown in the drawing, and the two bolts on the bottom of the grip (which I assume would tighten it) are clearly visible. They are also clearly identical in every way to the 1998 Yan Quad (linked above) which has Type-6 grips.

    Like

  5. V3's avatar V3 April 13, 2018 / 7:49 pm

    This lift has the Type 6 Grips, the issue with this generation Yan FG was the cast aluminum sheave assemblies not the grip. There was an issue with assemblies suffering from catastrophic cracking causing them to literally fall apart. The assemblies require an intensive inspection schedule which involves inspecting a small dimple ground into the assembly for cracks, if any appear the assembly is retired. My understanding is the wrong Aluminum alloy was used in certain production runs of these assemblies. These assemblies are only compatible with the type 6 grip and the Yan detachable grips.

    Like

    • Mason Schade's avatar Mason Schade November 30, 2020 / 1:29 pm

      I believe that isn’t entirely true because Mount Snow’s Challenger triple has these same assemblies that were relocated from Grand Summit Express/ Yankee Clipper. when they were replaced by the Poma retrofit, they went to Challenger whose chairs do not have the type 6 grips.

      Like

    • pbropetech's avatar pbropetech November 30, 2020 / 1:38 pm

      Also the Type 3s we used to have on E, R, and S.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Jonathan's avatar Jonathan April 23, 2018 / 8:23 am

    Why would anyone want to use type 6 grips. There is no point in Patenting them

    Like

    • pbropetech's avatar pbropetech January 18, 2021 / 10:50 am

      Why do you say that? There are any number of reasons Yan would have patented those grips, not least of which is he designed them.

      Like

  7. Maxwell Uguccioni's avatar Maxwell Uguccioni March 6, 2019 / 8:38 am

    Why does everyone hate the plastic chairs if they are so rare now?

    Like

    • John's avatar John March 6, 2019 / 9:44 am

      No, he means the plastic chairs. I have one in my yard. They were so light that they caused problems in the wind. Our S-lift had them, but we replaced them with the all-steel version. When we replaced the carriers on R and S Loveland bought them, refurbished them, and put them on their chair 2.

      Like

      • Maxwell Uguccioni's avatar Maxwell Uguccioni March 7, 2019 / 10:09 pm

        What is R and S?

        Like

        • Aksel Foles's avatar Aksel Foles March 9, 2019 / 6:50 pm

          Rendezvous and Sierra. Upper Mountain at Copper, Flyer side. It’s always easier as a liftie or patroller or mechanic (John) or crotchety local (me) to refer to chairs as numbers and letters. Especially if there’s wind and radios involved. Plus, marketing departments and execs with less working knowledge name the things, and the names are often, um, silly. Forest Queen at Crystal, for example. Ptarmigan, though, I dig. I’m at peace with my hypocrisy.

          Liked by 1 person

  8. Donald M. Reif's avatar Donald M. Reif March 21, 2019 / 2:47 pm

    This lift used to run all the way to the top of Ptarmigan, above timberline.

    Like

  9. Donald Reif's avatar Donald Reif May 17, 2019 / 3:41 pm

    There was a transition period in the last few years of the lift running all the way to the top of Ptarmigan where there was both a mid-unload and mid-load. For the longest time, there was just a mid-load there, which was towers 14-16: http://www.skilifts.org/old/images/resort_images/co-loveland/2/midstation2.jpg

    Then around 2011 or 2012 (someone get me more exact dates?), Loveland decided to put in a midway unload here but keep the midway load. They did so by having Doppelmayr install a pair of half towers in between tower 13 and the existing mid-load:

    There was the complication, though, of having two unload points, two load points, and nothing really being done to ensure that empty chairs were set aside for the midway load (a gate system like the Peak 8 SuperConnect’s would’ve been most ideal here). So this was often possible:

    Thus in 2015, Lift 2 was cut back to end at the midway-unload while Ptarmigan was built to replace the upper half, starting at the bottom of the old Pomalift and ending where Lift 2 used to have its return station.

    Like

    • Donald Reif's avatar Donald Reif May 17, 2019 / 3:43 pm

      This was what the midway area looked like when it had a mid-unload and mid-load:

      Like

    • Donald Reif's avatar Donald Reif January 4, 2021 / 3:49 pm

      And when on the lift, it is pretty easy to see that this lift originally traveled higher up because of the way the lift profile descends into the midstation.

      By correlation of that tree, I’d say that when the lift was shortened, the unload was placed at about where the mid-load was.

      Like

      • Mike's avatar michaelricci9 January 1, 2024 / 11:41 am

        I remember that. Caused an already long ride to be even longer due to the frequent number of stops

        Like

  10. Randy's avatar Randy November 15, 2020 / 3:00 pm

    This lift now has safety bars. I saw them in the latest picture on Lovelands facebook page.

    Like

    • Donald Reif's avatar Donald Reif November 26, 2020 / 6:23 pm

      Video too:

      Like

  11. Henry T's avatar Henry T September 5, 2022 / 2:35 pm

    What are they gonna do with the shared tower with lift 6 since that lift is being replaced?

    Like

    • Aidan Reilly's avatar Aidan Reilly September 5, 2022 / 2:43 pm

      They removed the sheave assemblies from it. Looks like that’s all they’re going to be doing.

      Like

Leave a reply to V3 Cancel reply