Slide Brook is the longest chairlift in the world at just over 11,000 feet. It connects two mountains and has a net vertical rise of less than 400′.Loading area on the Lincoln end.Tension station at Mt. Lincoln.This is approximately towers 30-40.Another view of the Mt. Lincoln section.The drive station at Mt. Ellen.Depression towers 1 and 2.Mt. Ellen station.View towards Lincoln Peak at tower 8.T4.Drive station seen from above.A section of the line on Mt. Ellen.View from Mt. Ellen toward Lincoln Peak.Tower 40 at the Lincoln Peak end of the lift.View riding out of the Lincoln Peak station.Combo tower 37.Tower 35.Tower 34 with a large foundation.One of three summits on this lift, none of which are at an end.View at the highest point on the Lincoln side.Riding down into one of the brooks.Stream crossing.Another high point along the line.Middle of the line.Second major stream crossing.A tower.View back toward Lincoln Peak.The highest point on the Mt. Ellen side.Drive terminal entrance.View riding toward Lincoln Peak.Towers with extra evacuation gear.At the stream crossings chairs are quite high above ground.Hold down towers.A low point along the line.The southernmost gully on the line.View about half way.The steepest section of the lift line riding south.Stream crossing below Lincoln Peak.View back toward Mt. Ellen.View North.Panoramic view of Lincoln Peak and Valley House.Riding into the return terminal.Doppelmayr Worldbook entry.
The biggest problem with this lift is that there needs to be sufficient snow underneath it so that ski patrol can evacuate it should anything go wrong.
I wonder how any mountain runs lifts in the summer then if they have to have snow under it to evac. Couldn’t they use atv’s to get around if there wasn’t snow? Whiteface runs their gondola all summer and the line is really steep and hard to get to. IMO you can’t advertise it as one ski area if you have to take a bus between the sections.
In my opinion saying they need snow under the lift to do an evac is an excuse for not running it to save money. Would’ve edited this into my previous comment but there’s no way to edit or delete comments.
The problem with Slide Brook is that it spends 11000 feet in no-mand’s land. If there was developed terrain that is easily accessible via snowcat or ATV, then the “must have sufficient snow below the lift line for evacuations” rule probably doesn’t apply. I have never ridden White Face’s Gondola, but do you know if it has some kind of special evacuation system? Red Pine at Park City has Poma’s Poma-Bus evacuation system for this purpose (to my understanding). I’m not sure if the “must have sufficient snow below the lift line for evacuations” applies to Whiteface’s Gondola, or if it is just a rule unique to Sugarbush and the Slide Brook Express due to its remoteness.
Look up the lift on New England Ski History and you’ll see multiple pics dated 2004 showing the lift open with zero snow underneath on the south facing sections of the line. Clearly wasn’t an issue then, so unless some regulation changed, the reason they are telling you it doesn’t open and the actual reason it doesn’t open are different.
From Remontees-Mecaniques: “The Slide Brook Express is theoretically open seven days a week. However, it is the most often closed ski area device as there are many opening restrictions due to the length of the facility and the constraints to it. vertical evacuation. Thus, the device is not open in case of bad weather, or in case of too windy day and also too cold, or in case of low snow because the evacuation is provided only with snowy ground. Note that regardless of whether or not the connection is operational, shuttles connect both sides of the ski area.”
They’re just regurgitating what marketing/PR tells people. The whole snow requirement might be a more recent thing as there are multiple pictures on the internet of that lift running without snow underneath it. Even if all that stuff is true with the weather related restrictions, it doesn’t change the fact that Sugarbush is too cheap to run their own shuttle between the base areas and instead just refers you to the local public bus that only runs once every hour and makes dozens of stops between the base areas and takes well over half an hour to complete the trip. If you drive yourself over you’d lose your parking spot which could be a big deal if you got there early on a busy day. They just don’t think they need to run it or provide a good alternative because many people just ski one side or the other on a given day and don’t go between. I really want to get to Sugarbush, but I don’t plan on doing that unless this lift is open and connecting the two mountains.
You are right Had the privilege of working on this huge project We spliced the rope one day and had to start rigging the next day to re splice
We went back to tension and re splice the week before Martin Luther King weekend then did it in the spring!!!
There is a long list of requirements needed to be met in order for Sugarbush to run this lift. #1. There has to be 1′ 1/2 of snow both underneath the lift and on the access road to the bottom of Slide Brook Basin. #2. The temperature must be above 5 degrees throughout the whole entire day. #3. There can´t be high winds. #4. The access road to the bottom of Slide Brook Basin must be groomed. Sugarbush has to want to run it also.
So if you don’t know already, AlpineZone is a website with a ton of forums about northeast skiing. I started a thread about Sugarbush lift replacements and brought up Slide Brook. Most people said they hated it and it was useless. My question for them is why. I love to be able to split my day between two mountains without having to worry about a bus timetable and it taking 45 minutes because it stops multiple times on its trip between mountains. I think these “Slide Brook haters” are just upset at the world and the modern Sugarbush. I truly hope that Alterra sees the vision that ASC once had for this resort and runs Slide Brook more often. I have confirmation from Win that the “safety standards” are Sugarbush’s own policy meaning that it is possible for Alterra to run it more often than the current ownership. I will be so happy to be able to ski both mountains in one day almost every time I ski at Sugarbush.
They could make it a chondola and when the requirements don’t allow the lift to run, they could only load the gondolas. That way you could still ride the chair if you want to and the conditions allow it.
Honestly, they should just make it a full gondola. I’ve never ridden slide brook myself, but I’ve ridden Chair 10 at Telluride (300 feet shorter), and it’s really not fun. As a lift people would ride at most twice a day, I don’t see the problem making it a full gondola, because if it was a chondola, unless it was 50 degrees out, the chairs would go completely empty.
The whole reason it is a chair is to make it effortless to traverse between the mountains. It is a nice ride that is rather pleasant that actually isn’t too long. Sunshine might be different in that way. Slide Brook (when it actually runs) is amazing. I ski at Sugarbush very often and it is always a treat when it is running. Too bad it doesn’t run more often.
Sunshine at Telluride has a bunch of long double greens and blues that can be lapped from it, and real estate that can be skied in/out of, and being an alternate route to Prospect Bowl and Gold Hill (when combined with Ute Park), has much more necessity.
If you come in March you’ll find that it runs most days thanks to more favorable weather and snow conditions. And a decent amount of people use it (at least on weekends) so the ski area certainly likes to run it if they can.
I think the best solution for Slide Brook is to simply expand into Slide Brook Basin. Two lifts, one to the top of Mt. Ellen and one to the top of North Lynx, would be all that is required to allow for a skiable connection. There are also some well pitched slopes in the area that would allow Sugarbush to offer a mixture of more mellow intermediates and challenging diamonds.
When Les Otten decided to build a lift here in 1995 he signed an agreement that Sugarbush can’t expand into the Slide Brook basin. Wildlife is also another concern. This simply won’t happen!
Agreements can be amended, or rewritten entirely, as time passes. In the 80s, Sugarbush submitted plans to the USFS to enter Slide Brook Basin with a proper pod, and they were approved at the time, so there is historical precedent for change. Perhaps Alterra could figure something out in the future.
In the long-term, something is going to give with this lift, as it does not operate enough to justify its existence and the required O&M will eventually add up. There are basically three options. Option A is to remove it without replacement, which would be the most cost-effective solution but carry with it the negative blowback of committing to divide Sugarbush in two. Option B is to replace it with something that can run more frequently, likely a gondola, which would mostly continue the status quo. Option C is to explore what would need to be done to get USFS approval to go into Slide Brook Basin, although this would likely be expensive and only make sense if Sugarbush is able to grow its annual skier visitation. For some reference, Sugarbush’s annual visitation peaked in the 80s, dipped by almost 40%-50% by the mid-2000s, and is only now rising back towards 80s levels. If this growth levels off, Option B is most likely. If it continues, Option C could make sense. If it were to dip once again, then Option A would be on the table.
I can’t see them abandoning this connection. It’s not that convenient to go by shuttle, as you have a long trudge to where the skiing is on the Lincoln Peak side (not so much on Mt. Ellen). Given that they are connecting two base areas at Pallisades – I don’t see them moving away from it here. A gondola might draw more usage and spread out the crowd a bit more. But I’m guessing they run it as is for the next five years. It doesn’t have that many hours on it, given how seldom it runs. Personally, I’d like to see a gondola, if it means it would run more….
Considering that Sugarbush sustained huge losses in 2020-2021 due to COVID, it is highly unlikely that they would even consider investing in any lift / gondola additions for the foreseeable future. They have two aging lifts, one at Heaven’s Gate and one at North Lynx, that will out of necessity need replacement. I can definitely see them abandoning this lift due to lack of people, parts, short hours of operation (10AM to 3PM), evac concerns and frequent closures due to weather and snow conditions. Although it is a great ride and well worth the price of admission just for that, chalk it up to another blunder by American Ski Company for building it in the first place.
Were having the same problem with operating john paul in the summer. JP has a very long and steep lift line and you cant really evacuate the lift in the summer because everyone is on foot. Not on skis or a snowboard. Slide brook is a mellow lift though. Cant they just rope you off and the patrol men take off your skis/board before you hit the ground? The big problem is getting everyone out after they get roped off. I imagine it would be a muddy mess trying to get out of there during bad snow years. If it were to happen on a bad snow year. Snowbasin gets plenty of snow so no problem in the winter.
Sugarbush is different than many other large mountains. They would never pave a road due to wildlife concerns and for the fact that the Slide Brook basin is supposed to be an untouched backcountry ski area. I ski at Sugarbush almost every weekend during the winter and I know for a fact that they would never spend that much money on a road for a lift that is clearly not a top priority for Sugarbush. Slide Brook is an extremely useful lift (when it runs), although Sugarbush treats Mt. Ellen as a secondary mountain that doesn’t need to be connected with Lincoln Peak. In my opinion, both mountains should be connected at all time as “Sugarbush”, not Lincoln Peak and Mt. Ellen as two separate areas, although this can’t happen due to the ridiculous operational constraints on Slide Brook.
A new trail pod from the lowest point on Slidebrook to near the ridgeline above North Lynx would be truly exceptional. The line would be roughly 1 mile long with a northeast exposure and a top elevation near 4000′. It would provide the kind of high-quality skiing to rival Lincoln Peak and Mt Ellen.
This would allow Sugarbush to deprecate the southern half of Slidebrook Express and either refurbish or replace the northern half as a much shorter lift.
Although it’s tempting to consider a complimentary lift/trail pod up to Mt Ellen, that terrain has a Southeast exposure (like Castle Rock) and would be more difficult to maintain and resurface.
It wouldn’t be an exaggeration to call this the best trail expansion in the northeast since Jordan Bowl. Unfortunately, it would need to overcome two massive roadblocks. First, renegotiating the agreement not to develop Slidebrook. And second, any expansion at or above the North Lynx triple would involve development in boreal forest (i.e. Bicknell’s Thrush habitat). That second consideration is what supposedly led Killington to abandon Upper Juggernaut when they had to clear land for the new South Ridge chair.
Donald, not possible when there’s conservation easements at play and the Slidebrook was a compromise. LBO wanted to connect the mountains with multiple pods. Turned out the Slidbrook drainage is a massive bear habitat. So the deal was struck to connect the two areas with a HSQ that can’t operate once the bears come out of torpor.
Calvin, agreed. The lift can’t operate from May-November as it is because of the bear habitat. Vermont would never permit such an expansion into the basin and is already a PITA when it comes to small projects.
I still think the cheapest and easiest to negotiate option could be to just add a load-only midstation at the lowest point of the current slidebrook lift. Opening that up alone would allow you to ski tons of terrain off the backside of north lynx and the side of Mount Ellen. They could also replace it with a gondola while they’re at it so that they can operate it on cold days.
Definitely won’t happen for the reasons cited above. Best you can hope for in Slidebrook is an expansion of the official gladed areas and enhanced shuttle service between North and South. There are plans with the NFS for same through the forest mgmt process, but don’t expect any lift expansion between North Lynx and Lower FIS, irrespective of how attractive the terrain may be.
I don’t understand the snow requirement for lift evacuations. Snow or no snow, there are at least two sections on this lift that rise 150-200 feet above some very steep, very remote terrain. Explain to me how you are supposed to evacuate someone from there before they die of exposure without being able to run the lift in any way.
Evacuation limitations is the reason given for late opening, and I assume early closing, of this lift. Having it enclosed would certainly make the ride more pleasant and a long evac situation endurable. I vote for telling Loon “we’ll buy your cabins” to encourage their upgrading their gondi. Many transfer type lifts are gondolas. But most accommodate non-skiers.
Early closing is due to the bears coming out of torpor.
ASC never had issues with enough snow for evacs. It’s a self-imposed restriction under Win’s ownership probably because its a costly lift to run with little perceived value.
The lift itself is not significantly more costly than something like Super Bravo. Otten made it a key point to finally connect the two sides and therefore was committed to having it run all the time. Win purchased the mountain for around the same money that Otten bought it in ’95, yet with millions in improvements since then. The lift is more of a maintenance nightmare than anything. Any line work (eg. sheave replacements) is extremely difficult to get to, even with sufficient snow. The lift isn’t maintained particularly well anymore either and has been sitting since last year with no work done. Win kept it running regardless of snow cover until around 2005.
I’ll also add that the snow cover requirement is almost entirely about the access roads into the basin. There are several of them and in order for snowmobiles to get in, they need to have enough snow to fill the water bars and to be groomed.
I think the best solution for slide brook is a gravel service road underneath the lift or a low capacity gondola. Since gondolas load from the side, a helicopter can lift people out of the cabins. Kicking horse BC did exactly that when there gondola broke down.
I’m sure the Coast Guard would not appreciate having to come from Cape Cod to evac people off of a gondola in Vermont via helicopter (and yes I’m serious if any sort of evac-via-chopper is needed in New England, it’s usually carried out by the Coast Guard which flies out of Cape Cod- they airlifted people off of Mt. Washington earlier this year).
There has been a lot of discussion regarding Slide Brook, both the basin and the chair itself, and here is a summary of the big picture as I understand it (both through outside knowledge and others on here):
Land Use:
-In general, Slide Brook Basin is owned by the USFS above 2600 feet and by Sugarbush below that, although this is not an exact science given that the property lines are straight lines and contour lines are not. The USFS also owns practically all of the Lincoln Peak area, with the exception of the base, and Sugarbush owns practically all of the Mt. Ellen area, with the exception of the summit of Mt. Ellen.
-USFS rules dictate that Slide Brook Basin cannot have any beech trees removed due to black bears eating their nuts, and the land is only open to skiers/machinery/vehicles/etc. while bears are hibernating (roughly December-March). Some thinning is possible (and likely has occurred) given that none of the beech trees, or any other plants that the bears need or use, are removed. From what I can tell, Sugarbush basically adopted USFS policies for their portion of Slide Brook Basin as part of the agreement.
-Other areas majority-owned by the USFS that Sugarbush operates on, namely Clay Brook Basin (Lincoln Peak/Castlerock) and Rice Brook Basin (North Lynx Peak/Village Run), are fair game for expansion subject to USFS approval. Sugarbush majority-owned areas, namely Lockwood Brook Basin (Lower FIS) and Chase Brook Basin (Inverness/North Ridge), are also fair game subject to approval.
Operations:
-Slide Brook needs a groomed, 18″ deep snow road to operate. This is a self-imposed rule in accordance with Sugarbush’s own existing operations and safety plan. It could be changed if Sugarbush revised its plan and is totally possible, but they have had no interest in doing so in recent history (likely due to an alternative safety plan costing them more money).
-Slide Brook may not operate outside of the December-March window for Slide Brook Basin due to it partially being on USFS land and Sugarbush agreeing to those restrictions as conditions to installation
My suggestion is a tracked machine that can operate in both mud and snow conditions and can handle fairly steep hills with a people mover cab similar to a snowcat.
My suggestion is a tracked machine that can operate in both mud and snow conditions and can handle fairly steep hills with a people mover cab similar to a snowcat.
Yep- Lots of those available to just be waiting for “what if”…
This lift is running for the 23 season i used it today 2-20 it did not have a foot and a half of snow to be exact in some spots it was bare no way a snow cat could get down the lift line
I’m not sure where the foot and a half number came from. They claim they need to be able to drive a snowmobile to all the towers, so if there’s enough snow to do that, then the lift should be open. They dragged their feet on opening it in January. Multiple times when there was enough snow, they didn’t run it, so I suspect that it had more to do with all the parts they stripped to keep Bravo and Gate House running. Sugarbush has had an insane amount of lift down time this year. Slide Brook, Castlerock, Summit,and especially GMX have all remained closed for multiple days in a row due to maintenance issues.
It’s more about having enough snow to groom the access roads into the basin. That means all water bars have to be filled. They had plenty of snow to open it on Ellen’s opening day but did not. Once it opens, it tends to stay open, even if there are bare spots on the line, it’s just the getting open that takes awhile.
I have never skied here but I have always wondered why this is not a low capacity gondola. It sounds like it serves no skiable terrain and is a pain to patrol the line. What was the thinking behind making it a detachable quad?
Lift Blog 
This was closed the day we went here so we had to take a shuttle.
LikeLike
The biggest problem with this lift is that there needs to be sufficient snow underneath it so that ski patrol can evacuate it should anything go wrong.
LikeLike
Yeah. The only easy thing to do is use a passenger snowcat.
LikeLike
I wonder how any mountain runs lifts in the summer then if they have to have snow under it to evac. Couldn’t they use atv’s to get around if there wasn’t snow? Whiteface runs their gondola all summer and the line is really steep and hard to get to. IMO you can’t advertise it as one ski area if you have to take a bus between the sections.
LikeLike
They don’t run it in the summer. Only Super Bravo.
LikeLike
In my opinion saying they need snow under the lift to do an evac is an excuse for not running it to save money. Would’ve edited this into my previous comment but there’s no way to edit or delete comments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is only because of evacuation not money. Sugarbush would be in big trouble if they couldn’t evacuate the lift. Vermont law says so.
LikeLike
The problem with Slide Brook is that it spends 11000 feet in no-mand’s land. If there was developed terrain that is easily accessible via snowcat or ATV, then the “must have sufficient snow below the lift line for evacuations” rule probably doesn’t apply. I have never ridden White Face’s Gondola, but do you know if it has some kind of special evacuation system? Red Pine at Park City has Poma’s Poma-Bus evacuation system for this purpose (to my understanding). I’m not sure if the “must have sufficient snow below the lift line for evacuations” applies to Whiteface’s Gondola, or if it is just a rule unique to Sugarbush and the Slide Brook Express due to its remoteness.
LikeLike
Look up the lift on New England Ski History and you’ll see multiple pics dated 2004 showing the lift open with zero snow underneath on the south facing sections of the line. Clearly wasn’t an issue then, so unless some regulation changed, the reason they are telling you it doesn’t open and the actual reason it doesn’t open are different.
LikeLike
From Remontees-Mecaniques: “The Slide Brook Express is theoretically open seven days a week. However, it is the most often closed ski area device as there are many opening restrictions due to the length of the facility and the constraints to it. vertical evacuation. Thus, the device is not open in case of bad weather, or in case of too windy day and also too cold, or in case of low snow because the evacuation is provided only with snowy ground. Note that regardless of whether or not the connection is operational, shuttles connect both sides of the ski area.”
LikeLike
They’re just regurgitating what marketing/PR tells people. The whole snow requirement might be a more recent thing as there are multiple pictures on the internet of that lift running without snow underneath it. Even if all that stuff is true with the weather related restrictions, it doesn’t change the fact that Sugarbush is too cheap to run their own shuttle between the base areas and instead just refers you to the local public bus that only runs once every hour and makes dozens of stops between the base areas and takes well over half an hour to complete the trip. If you drive yourself over you’d lose your parking spot which could be a big deal if you got there early on a busy day. They just don’t think they need to run it or provide a good alternative because many people just ski one side or the other on a given day and don’t go between. I really want to get to Sugarbush, but I don’t plan on doing that unless this lift is open and connecting the two mountains.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too!
LikeLike
The lift has 43 towers.
LikeLike
Im suprised this lift is not a dually (Dual tensioning) for being so long.
LikeLike
You are right Had the privilege of working on this huge project We spliced the rope one day and had to start rigging the next day to re splice
We went back to tension and re splice the week before Martin Luther King weekend then did it in the spring!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a long list of requirements needed to be met in order for Sugarbush to run this lift. #1. There has to be 1′ 1/2 of snow both underneath the lift and on the access road to the bottom of Slide Brook Basin. #2. The temperature must be above 5 degrees throughout the whole entire day. #3. There can´t be high winds. #4. The access road to the bottom of Slide Brook Basin must be groomed. Sugarbush has to want to run it also.
LikeLiked by 3 people
So pretty much, this lift never runs, but in marketing, they can pretend it does. Great.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9qVn-oG9kU
LikeLiked by 1 person
So if you don’t know already, AlpineZone is a website with a ton of forums about northeast skiing. I started a thread about Sugarbush lift replacements and brought up Slide Brook. Most people said they hated it and it was useless. My question for them is why. I love to be able to split my day between two mountains without having to worry about a bus timetable and it taking 45 minutes because it stops multiple times on its trip between mountains. I think these “Slide Brook haters” are just upset at the world and the modern Sugarbush. I truly hope that Alterra sees the vision that ASC once had for this resort and runs Slide Brook more often. I have confirmation from Win that the “safety standards” are Sugarbush’s own policy meaning that it is possible for Alterra to run it more often than the current ownership. I will be so happy to be able to ski both mountains in one day almost every time I ski at Sugarbush.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alterra has more money to spend, and I agree that they could probably prove these “Slide Brook haters” wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They could make it a chondola and when the requirements don’t allow the lift to run, they could only load the gondolas. That way you could still ride the chair if you want to and the conditions allow it.
LikeLike
Honestly, they should just make it a full gondola. I’ve never ridden slide brook myself, but I’ve ridden Chair 10 at Telluride (300 feet shorter), and it’s really not fun. As a lift people would ride at most twice a day, I don’t see the problem making it a full gondola, because if it was a chondola, unless it was 50 degrees out, the chairs would go completely empty.
LikeLike
Great idea. Dump a bunch of money into a lift with questionable utility, challenged economics and limited operability already.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The whole reason it is a chair is to make it effortless to traverse between the mountains. It is a nice ride that is rather pleasant that actually isn’t too long. Sunshine might be different in that way. Slide Brook (when it actually runs) is amazing. I ski at Sugarbush very often and it is always a treat when it is running. Too bad it doesn’t run more often.
LikeLike
Sunshine at Telluride has a bunch of long double greens and blues that can be lapped from it, and real estate that can be skied in/out of, and being an alternate route to Prospect Bowl and Gold Hill (when combined with Ute Park), has much more necessity.
LikeLike
Maybe a quad bubble in the future. Something as a cross between the two while still making it easy to get on/off.
LikeLike
If you come in March you’ll find that it runs most days thanks to more favorable weather and snow conditions. And a decent amount of people use it (at least on weekends) so the ski area certainly likes to run it if they can.
LikeLike
I think the best solution for Slide Brook is to simply expand into Slide Brook Basin. Two lifts, one to the top of Mt. Ellen and one to the top of North Lynx, would be all that is required to allow for a skiable connection. There are also some well pitched slopes in the area that would allow Sugarbush to offer a mixture of more mellow intermediates and challenging diamonds.
LikeLike
When Les Otten decided to build a lift here in 1995 he signed an agreement that Sugarbush can’t expand into the Slide Brook basin. Wildlife is also another concern. This simply won’t happen!
LikeLike
Agreements can be amended, or rewritten entirely, as time passes. In the 80s, Sugarbush submitted plans to the USFS to enter Slide Brook Basin with a proper pod, and they were approved at the time, so there is historical precedent for change. Perhaps Alterra could figure something out in the future.
In the long-term, something is going to give with this lift, as it does not operate enough to justify its existence and the required O&M will eventually add up. There are basically three options. Option A is to remove it without replacement, which would be the most cost-effective solution but carry with it the negative blowback of committing to divide Sugarbush in two. Option B is to replace it with something that can run more frequently, likely a gondola, which would mostly continue the status quo. Option C is to explore what would need to be done to get USFS approval to go into Slide Brook Basin, although this would likely be expensive and only make sense if Sugarbush is able to grow its annual skier visitation. For some reference, Sugarbush’s annual visitation peaked in the 80s, dipped by almost 40%-50% by the mid-2000s, and is only now rising back towards 80s levels. If this growth levels off, Option B is most likely. If it continues, Option C could make sense. If it were to dip once again, then Option A would be on the table.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t see them abandoning this connection. It’s not that convenient to go by shuttle, as you have a long trudge to where the skiing is on the Lincoln Peak side (not so much on Mt. Ellen). Given that they are connecting two base areas at Pallisades – I don’t see them moving away from it here. A gondola might draw more usage and spread out the crowd a bit more. But I’m guessing they run it as is for the next five years. It doesn’t have that many hours on it, given how seldom it runs. Personally, I’d like to see a gondola, if it means it would run more….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Considering that Sugarbush sustained huge losses in 2020-2021 due to COVID, it is highly unlikely that they would even consider investing in any lift / gondola additions for the foreseeable future. They have two aging lifts, one at Heaven’s Gate and one at North Lynx, that will out of necessity need replacement. I can definitely see them abandoning this lift due to lack of people, parts, short hours of operation (10AM to 3PM), evac concerns and frequent closures due to weather and snow conditions. Although it is a great ride and well worth the price of admission just for that, chalk it up to another blunder by American Ski Company for building it in the first place.
LikeLike
Think again. Read their latest Sugarblog article.
LikeLike
Is this the only Doppelmayr high-speed quad that can run at 1100 fpm?
LikeLike
Definitely not, the only one that comes to mind is Timberline at Copper, but there’s definitely a few more that can.
LikeLike
Gem Lake Express at Big White, Summit Express at Keystone, Wildcat Express at Wildcat and Lodge at YC.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Were having the same problem with operating john paul in the summer. JP has a very long and steep lift line and you cant really evacuate the lift in the summer because everyone is on foot. Not on skis or a snowboard. Slide brook is a mellow lift though. Cant they just rope you off and the patrol men take off your skis/board before you hit the ground? The big problem is getting everyone out after they get roped off. I imagine it would be a muddy mess trying to get out of there during bad snow years. If it were to happen on a bad snow year. Snowbasin gets plenty of snow so no problem in the winter.
LikeLike
The only solution I can think of for slide brook is a paved road so evacuation doesnt turn into a muddy mess. Would be very expensive though.
LikeLike
Sugarbush is different than many other large mountains. They would never pave a road due to wildlife concerns and for the fact that the Slide Brook basin is supposed to be an untouched backcountry ski area. I ski at Sugarbush almost every weekend during the winter and I know for a fact that they would never spend that much money on a road for a lift that is clearly not a top priority for Sugarbush. Slide Brook is an extremely useful lift (when it runs), although Sugarbush treats Mt. Ellen as a secondary mountain that doesn’t need to be connected with Lincoln Peak. In my opinion, both mountains should be connected at all time as “Sugarbush”, not Lincoln Peak and Mt. Ellen as two separate areas, although this can’t happen due to the ridiculous operational constraints on Slide Brook.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point, I can’t imagine having to get everyone out with a mountains small fleet of utv’s in a timely manner
LikeLiked by 1 person
If they did replace Slide Brooks Express. Would they go with L-P for this project or not?
LikeLike
No, it would be Doppelmayr, and there’s no way that they’ll ever replace Slide Brook. Sadly, that’s just reality.
LikeLike
Even a mid load station at the bottom would be really nice to have on this lift.
LikeLike
Agree 100% but I’m pretty sure that is prohibited per the agreement with the State of Vermont that allowed SB to build this lift in the first place.
LikeLike
A new trail pod from the lowest point on Slidebrook to near the ridgeline above North Lynx would be truly exceptional. The line would be roughly 1 mile long with a northeast exposure and a top elevation near 4000′. It would provide the kind of high-quality skiing to rival Lincoln Peak and Mt Ellen.
This would allow Sugarbush to deprecate the southern half of Slidebrook Express and either refurbish or replace the northern half as a much shorter lift.
Although it’s tempting to consider a complimentary lift/trail pod up to Mt Ellen, that terrain has a Southeast exposure (like Castle Rock) and would be more difficult to maintain and resurface.
It wouldn’t be an exaggeration to call this the best trail expansion in the northeast since Jordan Bowl. Unfortunately, it would need to overcome two massive roadblocks. First, renegotiating the agreement not to develop Slidebrook. And second, any expansion at or above the North Lynx triple would involve development in boreal forest (i.e. Bicknell’s Thrush habitat). That second consideration is what supposedly led Killington to abandon Upper Juggernaut when they had to clear land for the new South Ridge chair.
LikeLike
*in New England since Jordan Bowl. Gore’s had some good ones in the past 20 years :)
LikeLike
Les Otten agreed to never expand into slidebrook basin so that will never happen.
LikeLike
Thing is, agreements can be renegotiated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Donald, not possible when there’s conservation easements at play and the Slidebrook was a compromise. LBO wanted to connect the mountains with multiple pods. Turned out the Slidbrook drainage is a massive bear habitat. So the deal was struck to connect the two areas with a HSQ that can’t operate once the bears come out of torpor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Calvin, agreed. The lift can’t operate from May-November as it is because of the bear habitat. Vermont would never permit such an expansion into the basin and is already a PITA when it comes to small projects.
LikeLike
I still think the cheapest and easiest to negotiate option could be to just add a load-only midstation at the lowest point of the current slidebrook lift. Opening that up alone would allow you to ski tons of terrain off the backside of north lynx and the side of Mount Ellen. They could also replace it with a gondola while they’re at it so that they can operate it on cold days.
LikeLike
Definitely won’t happen for the reasons cited above. Best you can hope for in Slidebrook is an expansion of the official gladed areas and enhanced shuttle service between North and South. There are plans with the NFS for same through the forest mgmt process, but don’t expect any lift expansion between North Lynx and Lower FIS, irrespective of how attractive the terrain may be.
LikeLike
Act-250!
LikeLike
I don’t understand the snow requirement for lift evacuations. Snow or no snow, there are at least two sections on this lift that rise 150-200 feet above some very steep, very remote terrain. Explain to me how you are supposed to evacuate someone from there before they die of exposure without being able to run the lift in any way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Evacuation limitations is the reason given for late opening, and I assume early closing, of this lift. Having it enclosed would certainly make the ride more pleasant and a long evac situation endurable. I vote for telling Loon “we’ll buy your cabins” to encourage their upgrading their gondi. Many transfer type lifts are gondolas. But most accommodate non-skiers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Early closing is due to the bears coming out of torpor.
ASC never had issues with enough snow for evacs. It’s a self-imposed restriction under Win’s ownership probably because its a costly lift to run with little perceived value.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The lift itself is not significantly more costly than something like Super Bravo. Otten made it a key point to finally connect the two sides and therefore was committed to having it run all the time. Win purchased the mountain for around the same money that Otten bought it in ’95, yet with millions in improvements since then. The lift is more of a maintenance nightmare than anything. Any line work (eg. sheave replacements) is extremely difficult to get to, even with sufficient snow. The lift isn’t maintained particularly well anymore either and has been sitting since last year with no work done. Win kept it running regardless of snow cover until around 2005.
LikeLike
I’ll also add that the snow cover requirement is almost entirely about the access roads into the basin. There are several of them and in order for snowmobiles to get in, they need to have enough snow to fill the water bars and to be groomed.
LikeLike
I think the best solution for slide brook is a gravel service road underneath the lift or a low capacity gondola. Since gondolas load from the side, a helicopter can lift people out of the cabins. Kicking horse BC did exactly that when there gondola broke down.
LikeLike
I’m sure the Coast Guard would not appreciate having to come from Cape Cod to evac people off of a gondola in Vermont via helicopter (and yes I’m serious if any sort of evac-via-chopper is needed in New England, it’s usually carried out by the Coast Guard which flies out of Cape Cod- they airlifted people off of Mt. Washington earlier this year).
LikeLiked by 1 person
There has been a lot of discussion regarding Slide Brook, both the basin and the chair itself, and here is a summary of the big picture as I understand it (both through outside knowledge and others on here):
Land Use:
-In general, Slide Brook Basin is owned by the USFS above 2600 feet and by Sugarbush below that, although this is not an exact science given that the property lines are straight lines and contour lines are not. The USFS also owns practically all of the Lincoln Peak area, with the exception of the base, and Sugarbush owns practically all of the Mt. Ellen area, with the exception of the summit of Mt. Ellen.
-USFS rules dictate that Slide Brook Basin cannot have any beech trees removed due to black bears eating their nuts, and the land is only open to skiers/machinery/vehicles/etc. while bears are hibernating (roughly December-March). Some thinning is possible (and likely has occurred) given that none of the beech trees, or any other plants that the bears need or use, are removed. From what I can tell, Sugarbush basically adopted USFS policies for their portion of Slide Brook Basin as part of the agreement.
-Other areas majority-owned by the USFS that Sugarbush operates on, namely Clay Brook Basin (Lincoln Peak/Castlerock) and Rice Brook Basin (North Lynx Peak/Village Run), are fair game for expansion subject to USFS approval. Sugarbush majority-owned areas, namely Lockwood Brook Basin (Lower FIS) and Chase Brook Basin (Inverness/North Ridge), are also fair game subject to approval.
Operations:
-Slide Brook needs a groomed, 18″ deep snow road to operate. This is a self-imposed rule in accordance with Sugarbush’s own existing operations and safety plan. It could be changed if Sugarbush revised its plan and is totally possible, but they have had no interest in doing so in recent history (likely due to an alternative safety plan costing them more money).
-Slide Brook may not operate outside of the December-March window for Slide Brook Basin due to it partially being on USFS land and Sugarbush agreeing to those restrictions as conditions to installation
Feel free to add to this list.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Slidebrook is also allowed to run from June-August for required maintenance only.
LikeLike
My suggestion is a tracked machine that can operate in both mud and snow conditions and can handle fairly steep hills with a people mover cab similar to a snowcat.
LikeLike
Slidebrook has 100 chairs and carries people both directions. We are talking about extracting 400 people from remote mountain wilderness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
However, the reality is that when running, it’s probably only 10% utilized. But I understand and am fine with the restrictions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Probably doesn’t cut it when you have to develop an emergency action plan.
LikeLike
Jasen- Thanks for the First Hand knowledge!
My suggestion is a tracked machine that can operate in both mud and snow conditions and can handle fairly steep hills with a people mover cab similar to a snowcat.
Yep- Lots of those available to just be waiting for “what if”…
LikeLike
Honestly I would be fine if Alterra replaced the current terminals with newer UNI-G terminals
LikeLike
What will that do for the overall operation of the lift?
LikeLiked by 1 person
the lift has 40 towers (minor correction)
LikeLike
This lift is running for the 23 season i used it today 2-20 it did not have a foot and a half of snow to be exact in some spots it was bare no way a snow cat could get down the lift line
LikeLike
I’m not sure where the foot and a half number came from. They claim they need to be able to drive a snowmobile to all the towers, so if there’s enough snow to do that, then the lift should be open. They dragged their feet on opening it in January. Multiple times when there was enough snow, they didn’t run it, so I suspect that it had more to do with all the parts they stripped to keep Bravo and Gate House running. Sugarbush has had an insane amount of lift down time this year. Slide Brook, Castlerock, Summit,and especially GMX have all remained closed for multiple days in a row due to maintenance issues.
LikeLike
It’s more about having enough snow to groom the access roads into the basin. That means all water bars have to be filled. They had plenty of snow to open it on Ellen’s opening day but did not. Once it opens, it tends to stay open, even if there are bare spots on the line, it’s just the getting open that takes awhile.
LikeLike
I have never skied here but I have always wondered why this is not a low capacity gondola. It sounds like it serves no skiable terrain and is a pain to patrol the line. What was the thinking behind making it a detachable quad?
LikeLike
max, you are incorrect on that one. i was there and there was bearly any snow underneath the lift
LikeLike
Glad to see the updated pictures!
LikeLike