Sunday River, ME

Click on a lift’s name for pictures.  View in fullscreen↗

31 thoughts on “Sunday River, ME

  1. TJ November 19, 2015 / 3:13 pm

    spruce got a carpet not locke!

    Like

  2. TJ November 19, 2015 / 3:14 pm

    and the pullman berry was barker not locke!

    Like

  3. newenglandskilifts March 2, 2017 / 10:24 am

    the Barker Mountain Express (lift 1) can only run at 800fpm as of this year

    Like

  4. Max Hart January 13, 2018 / 12:10 pm

    Peter have you heard anything strange about the Chondola recently? Apparently there is a rumor (at least I hope its just a rumor) that the cabins have been taken off of the line and will not return during this ski season.

    Like

    • Peter Landsman January 13, 2018 / 1:19 pm

      Sounds like reports of the cabins’ demise were greatly exaggerated.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. ski.the.RIVER September 25, 2018 / 3:39 pm

    When will the Barker Mountain Express be replaced? At this point it runs so slow and just creates lines. Do you think Doppelmayr will come in soon?

    Like

  6. Jim January 14, 2019 / 11:03 am

    Can you double check the vertical rise for the Spruce Peak chairlift? You report 1207′ and Sunday River website reports 1500′.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Peter Landsman January 14, 2019 / 11:14 am

      Google Earth shows 1,205’. Someday Bigger may be counting the elevation from the very bottom of White Cap?

      Like

      • tjskiloaf17 January 14, 2019 / 12:08 pm

        Even Peter calls them Someday Bigger! I love it

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Peter January 14, 2019 / 12:37 pm

    Why is it called Someday Bigger?

    Liked by 1 person

    • BeyondtheLodge January 15, 2019 / 8:12 am

      That is what Sugarloafers (and some others) commonly refer to Sunday River as, because no matter how much Les tried to expand SR it would never be as big as its (former) rival, Sugarloaf.

      Like

  8. Collin Parsons October 20, 2019 / 10:08 pm

    Barker has to be replaced soon, but I don’t really see any other issues with Sunday River’s lift system that require replacements. I think they’ll end up getting a bubble-6 for Barker and then that’s it for lifts.

    Max Hart pointed out in another thread that Aurora and White Cap are underutilized compared to other parts of the mountain. I think the snowmaking upgrade will even out utilization more than the lifts will. Neither Aurora nor any of the White Cap lifts are over 4000 feet long and that usually means fixed grip unless it’s a very crowded location. They could always add loading carpets to Lift 9 and/or 12 to speed them up.

    Like

  9. Donald Reif October 21, 2019 / 1:12 pm

    Might want to add a note on Little White Cap, as it has Leitner-Poma sheaves and chair hangers.

    Like

    • Max Hart October 21, 2019 / 6:09 pm

      So does White Heat, Tempest, and Aurora. Poma grips as well.

      Like

  10. skitheeast November 25, 2019 / 7:57 pm

    With Boyne CEO Stephen Kircher announcing on the Storm Skiing podcast that Sunday River will receive a number of lift upgrades in the upcoming years, I thought I would make a list of the lifts that most need an upgrade:

    1) Barker – It’s unreliable, old, and the workhorse out of Barker. It’s probably the eight pack Kircher hinted at for the east coast.
    2) White Cap – An old quad with a liftline long enough to warrant a high-speed lift. It’s also the gateway to the rest of the mountain from the White Cap base, which itself has no high-speed lifts.
    3) Locke – It’s the oldest lift at the resort and is too long to be anything but a high-speed lift. Also, upgrading this lift would seriously lower Barker’s crowds.
    4) White Heat/Little White Cap – When Kircher discussed cutting new trails, I immediately thought of the White Cap pod. The topography of the mountain allows for one continuous top to bottom flow but the existing trails are cut in such a way to segment it into an upper and lower half. A single detachable lift here combined with the cutting of new trails to improve top to bottom flow would result in the largest vertical of any Sunday River lift and replace two 1980s fixed-grip lifts.
    5) Aurora infill – An indirect replacement lift for the Jordan Double, but the only large undeveloped area of terrain within the existing boundaries is between Oz and Aurora. A lift beginning down at Jordan base to the top of Aurora could be accompanied by a nice size trail pod like Kircher hinted at in the podcast.

    Five lifts in addition to the potential 9th and 10th peak lifts Kircher mentioned is a lot, but if Boyne is planning on being aggressive with their lift infrastructure, then this is perfectly feasible at a resort that has seen 3 new lifts in the past 20 years.

    Like

    • Max Hart January 14, 2020 / 11:13 am

      Barker has got to go, no question about it. A CLD6, bubbled or not, would make sense there because it services a massive area. The quad’s design capacity is 3000 riders/hr, which it can not comfortably achieve (it usually runs at ~2100 riders/hr and a very reduced speed). I would hope that such a lift would have a full parking rail so that they can avoid issues with icing caused by snowmaking on Rocking Chair and Agony (a problem which is currently plaguing that lift).

      However Locke isn’t going anywhere. They need a fixed grip there for early season, and with Jungle Road and Jim’s Whim accessing most of Locke’s terrain via Barker, and increase in capacity there would flood the area. It’s a secondary lift, and it will always be that way; in the last 15 years it has only run weekends and holidays after early season.

      A Tempest / Lift 9 replacement would be welcome, and would hopefully draw more people to the White Cap Lodge (I’m sure all of the ski-in-ski-out owners in the vicinity of Roadrunner would like the detachable too). White Cap won’t get a top-to-bottom lift. The White Heat Quad services mostly expert terrain, and Little White Cap services beginner terrain (there’s actually a few nice trails over there with room for a few more). It also directly services the Grand Summit Hotel. White Heat Quad / Lift 10 should stay, but Little White Cap / Lift 11 is questionable. It should defiantly remain a quad, but it uses parts from the Barker Double, a Pullman-Berry from 1972. It also got a new motor recently. I think the Pullman-Berry parts should be replaced at some point and should Barker get replaced give it’s omega quad chairs to LWC / Lift 11.

      An Aurora infill lift will not happen. The big intersection on Aurora is already congested enough at peak times (the rest of Aurora is not), the last thing they need is another secondary lift to pour more people into that area. Hopefully they won’t ever touch the area to the skier’s left of Northern Lights. The Poppy Fields effect does not need to be replicated. Ever. It would make more sense to replace Jordan all together with a CLD6. Like Barker, it services a massive area on its own 90% of the time (Lollapalooza all the way to Northern Lights via Kansas and back via Firestar).

      All of that would leave Tempest / Lift 9 and Jordan as prime reinstallation candidates. Tempest would be about right for the 9th Peak / Merrill Hill (assuming it started at the bottom of the North Peak chair and ended at the top of the peak), and Jordan as the main lift on the north face of the 10th Peak (which would be northwest of the top of Jordan, beyond Lolla). An access lift would also need to run from the bottom of Jordan up to the ridge above the Jordan Hotel.

      Like

      • Teddy's Lift World January 14, 2020 / 1:26 pm

        Just curious, why haven’t more trails been built off of Jordan Bowl? The area seems pretty lacking considering there are only 3 trails to the skier’s left.

        Like

        • Max Hart January 14, 2020 / 2:17 pm

          They never needed it. Lolla, Excalibur, and Rogue can easily (and comfortably) absorb the capacity of the Jordan Bowl Express. All three of those trails are long, very wide, and have no intersections anywhere.

          Then there are the glades, which are pretty much everywhere thanks to the boundary-to-boundary policy.

          Like

      • Donald Reif February 5, 2020 / 12:27 pm

        Locke was also just modified to accommodate the new T-Bar.

        Like

    • Mike B February 5, 2020 / 10:36 am

      Pretty much focused on the core. Nothing really surprising here IMO. Smart by Boyne to invest in marketing efforts tied to long-term strategic plans – Sugarloaf, Loon, Big Sky and now Sunday River all have them. Surefire way to get the loyalists excited and to attract some attention outside of that group.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Tucker Stanton February 7, 2020 / 12:58 pm

        Sugarloaf kinda bailed on their 2020 plans, which sucks because they had a LOT of potential with them. They’ve been having trouble trying to attract more people to ski at their resort. I don’t think you’ll see anything different in the next couple years.

        Like

        • Tucker Stanton February 26, 2020 / 11:48 am

          Nevermind, Sugarloaf 2030 was just announced.

          Like

    • powderforever45 February 5, 2020 / 2:37 pm

      Replacing Barker is in short term. Finally a replacement for that lift.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Donald Reif February 5, 2020 / 3:43 pm

        The line’s been surveyed twice, so Boyne really ought to announce it sooner rather than later.

        Like

        • skiz February 5, 2020 / 3:52 pm

          I’ll bet they are waiting to see if they can get Hermitage’s barnstormer

          Like

    • s February 5, 2020 / 2:43 pm

      in suspect this is to foreshadow barker replacement

      Like

  11. gavin February 5, 2020 / 8:44 pm

    what’s the tempest quad

    Like

  12. Tom White February 6, 2020 / 7:07 am

    The Tempest Quad is the White Cap Quad #9 on their map. Many call it Tempest because that’s the trail’s name, plus one doesn’t confuse it with the Little White Cap quad #11. It would be good to make Tempest a HSQ. It would make the underutilized White Cap Lodge more attractive to day users. Plus, the Grand Summit and condo users would like that.

    As to the Barker replacement, I too think Boyne would like to use Barnstormer for that. While not a perfect fit as we have noted, it would be a move within New England. However, Boyne could move that elsewhere (Sugarloaf) and replace Barker with a new HSS.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Peter Landsman Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s