Big Burn – Snowmass, CO

img_9058
View up the line from the base.
img_9062
Both terminals are completely unique in North America.
img_9064
Poma “pancake” style return.
img_9068
Lift line overview.
img_9087
Riding up the line.
img_9093
The breakover, towers 26-27.
img_9099
Overhead Alpha-style drive.
img_9102
This was one of the first overhead detachable drives built in North America.
img_9105
Top station from below.
img_9107
View down the lift line.
img_9109
Looking up towards the top.
img_9111
This lift has very consistent pitch along its entire length.
img_9113
Lower lift line.
img_9902
Bottom station from above.
img_9907
Contours are driven by shafts rather than PTO belts.
img_9908
Drive bullwheel and turnaround.
Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Big Burn – Snowmass, CO

  1. Collin September 13, 2018 / 8:56 pm

    The terminal design looks like a prototype from when Poma was developing a replacement for the Alpha-Falcon. This is the first Poma detachable to have an overhead drive in North America. Everything else from 1987 and earlier has either a vault-drive or a separate Alpha drive. Eventually they settled on the 1988 style terminal with the full glass siding.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Duncan October 28, 2018 / 9:07 am

      The one that only had three built?

      Like

      • Max Hart October 28, 2018 / 6:36 pm

        Yes. White Peaks at Waterville, Angel and Sunshine Village, and Rainier at Crystal Mtn. Replaced with the Competition terminal the next year.

        Like

        • Bennett Dugas February 13, 2019 / 1:50 pm

          I believe it was called the Challenge terminal.

          Like

        • Bennett Dugas February 13, 2019 / 1:51 pm

          Edit: My other reply was referring to the 1988 terminal, not the Competition.

          Like

        • Max Hart February 13, 2019 / 4:28 pm

          The 1988 terminal did not have a name. The Challengers first appeared in 1990 and were last built in 1998.

          Like

    • Thomas Jett October 29, 2018 / 12:15 am

      Do you guys think that “Integrated Falcon” would be a good name to call this terminal?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Duncan October 29, 2018 / 10:36 am

        Reasonable.

        Like

      • John February 13, 2019 / 11:42 am

        The detach mechanism from this era was called Performance, not Falcon. My prints from the old Flyer, if they referred to a model name at all besides ‘telesiege debrayable’, called it the Performant in French.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Collin Parsons February 13, 2019 / 12:46 pm

          I think it was sold as “Falcon” in North America, same with the chairs which the official name was Arceaux in Europe. That’s what the Skilifts.org lift identification page calls them both.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. Alex February 13, 2019 / 1:36 pm

    Does anyone know when Snowmass plans to upgrade/replace Big Burn and Coney Glade? Both of those lifts are getting very old.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s