Bullwheel Failure Injures 15 in Spain

Photo credit: Meteosojuela La Rioja via X

The top bullwheel detached from a chairlift in Spain this morning, injuring more than 15 people. The incident happened at Astún, a resort with 15 lifts located in the Pyrenees. Without a bullwheel retention device, the bullwheel came to rest vertically and the lift rapidly lost tension, causing chairs to contact the ground along the line. The lift de-roped on numerous towers and chairs could be seen mangled with an evacuation underway. The government said three people were seriously injured with helicopters shuttling people to hospitals. Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, posted on X that he was “shocked by the news of the accident at the Astún station” and offered full support to local authorities and the victims.

Photo credit: Meteosojuela La Rioja via X

The lift that failed is a 1989 fixed grip quad called Canal Roya. It was constructed by Spanish manufacturer REAC, which does not have any installations in the United States or Canada.

The incident appears similar to the 1985 Teller lift accident at Keystone, which killed two people and seriously injured 49. That lift was constructed by Yan and an investigation revealed a faulty weld caused the top bullwheel to detach.

28 thoughts on “Bullwheel Failure Injures 15 in Spain

  1. vons3's avatar vons3 January 18, 2025 / 9:40 am

    Its kinda interesting that the Euro manufactures have BW retention devices available and they do install them on NA bound products but not EU equipment because its not in the CEN code.

    Like

    • Billuh's avatar Billuh January 18, 2025 / 10:08 am

      But, hey, safety bars on all the chairs.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Skier's avatar Skier January 18, 2025 / 11:14 am

      Wait wait wait. Is that true? I can’t believe that bullwheel retention isn’t part of the code there. It’s such a small amount of metal needed to do it as well. Look at a Skytrac return, which is basically this terminal that failed but with the bullwheel on top instead of below. Its bullwheel retention device is two small semi-circles of metal bolted on to catch a flange on the bullwheel hub in case of failure. Cheap to do but prevents a disaster like this.

      Like

      • vons3's avatar vons3 January 18, 2025 / 5:07 pm

        The Skytrac return on the Kachina Peak lift at Taos is essentially the same as this lift but there is a retaining device, ie a bullwheel hub flange with interlocking plates on the frame.

        Like

    • Chris's avatar Chris January 19, 2025 / 1:09 pm

      BW retention is required in the CEN code, but that only applies to lifts built in 2000 or later. In most countries they are also a mandatory retrofit, but apparently not in Spain.

      Like

  2. JS's avatar JS January 18, 2025 / 10:15 am

    Teller was the drive bullwheel that failed, this one is the return.

    Like

    • WH2OSHREDDER.'s avatar WH2OSHREDDER. January 18, 2025 / 10:16 am

      Same Concept.

      Like

    • pbropetech's avatar pbropetech January 18, 2025 / 3:29 pm

      No difference in results. Both top bullwheels. This one is likely a bearing failure given that the shaft is still visible in the photos, but it doesn’t really matter to the public. I hope the investigation results are made public so we may learn from it.

      Like

  3. Dan's avatar Dan January 18, 2025 / 12:57 pm

    Thanks for giving the real reason the YAN failed. So many just bash the man. But in this case it was a poorly executed weld.

    Like

  4. Bluebottlenose's avatar Bluebottlenose January 18, 2025 / 1:00 pm

    Looks very similar to Teller at Keystone more than 30 years ago, but its almost certainly too early to draw conclusions

    Like

  5. Dana's avatar Dana January 18, 2025 / 3:18 pm

    Hi Peter,

    Very interesting website, thank you. Are you aware of any chairlifts in a National Park?

    Also- what is the most common types of lift failures?

    Like

    • G1's avatar G1 January 21, 2025 / 5:52 pm

      There are chairlifts in 2 national parks, Badger Mtn. in Yosemite National Park and Boston Mills Ski area in Brandywine National Park. Hurricane Ridge National Park has surface lifts in Olympic National Park. There are also lifts in some national parks in Canada.

      Like

  6. Kirk's avatar Kirk January 18, 2025 / 3:36 pm

    Pretty Bizarre to see the Bullwheel shaft sticking out the bottom of the frame. The entire weight of the Bullwheel could be hanging on whatever type of bolted retaining plate they used in event of a bearing failure. Poma and CTEC have return Bullwheels on cantilevered shafts, but the shaft and Bullwheel are on top of the frame. So in theory the Bullwheel would stay in place even without a retainer plate.

    Like

  7. Bill Fetcher's avatar Bill Fetcher January 18, 2025 / 3:38 pm

    Following the Teller lift accident at Keystone, bullwheel retainers were installed on lifts by Lift Engineering (YAN). An example is the Four Points triple chair at Steamboat. This lift started life in 1983 as the Storm Peak Lift. In 1992 the lift was shortened and renamed Four Points.

    Bill Fetcher

    Steamboat Springs

    Like

    • Greg's avatar Greg January 19, 2025 / 4:22 am

      I didn’t know a Bullwheel was called a Bullwheel until reading this article, I was looking to see what the lift failure was. I saw the photo of the Bwheel on its side, and the down facing shaft, and instantly thought to myself, why the **** didn’t they engineer it to be on top?

      Like

      • Dopeway's avatar Dopeway January 21, 2025 / 9:31 am

        Consider that, if the BW was on top of this return structure – and all other things were the same – the BW and rope would not have been captured by the vertical column of the terminal structure.

        Instead, the rope would have likely shot downhill like a rubber band and potentially turned the BW into a very dangerous projectile in the process.

        Like

  8. SUNAPEE INSIDER's avatar SUNAPEE INSIDER January 19, 2025 / 9:01 am

    A 20 year old Doppelmayr triple at Mt. Sunapee launched its return bull wheel on Christmas Day 2007. Not great weather and early in the day so there were only 21 people on the lift (of a potential 207!) The only injury was a broken arm for a child who fell a short distance. Everyone else was rope evac’d. None of the towers de-roped – probably because the line was only 10% loaded. It was back in operation in about 3.5 weeks, IIRC.

    Like

  9. G Sexauer's avatar G Sexauer January 30, 2025 / 10:21 am

    Scary stuff! Correction on the heading, though: a score means 20, so if 30 people were injured, it wasn’t “scores”. -Gustave

    Like

Leave a reply to liftnerd Cancel reply