News Roundup: Modernizing


16 thoughts on “News Roundup: Modernizing

  1. skitheeast June 26, 2020 / 11:23 am

    Good to hear Jackson Hole is attempting to remain on schedule in replacing lifts!

    In an ideal world, I would replace Sublette with a detachable quad and use its equipment to install a Hoback lift, running from the bottom intersection of North Hoback and Union Pass up to Rendezvous and the Hoback entrance.


  2. Alex June 27, 2020 / 6:47 am

    I think there is a big opportunity to reimagine that entire side of the mountain. I would consider two lifts: (a) a detachable quad (2400 PPH) running from the bottom of the Union Pass chair to the junction of the Rendezvous and Hobacks trails, and (b) a detachable six pack (3200 PPH) running from the current base of Thunder to the top of Sublette.


    • skitheeast June 27, 2020 / 4:13 pm

      Combining Thunder and Sublette into a single lift is an interesting idea. The only negative I could see would be an increase in skiers having to use South Pass Traverse to head back to the base of the lift. Plus, Laramie Traverse could receive an influx of intermediate skiers heading from the top of the lift to Amphitheater and Gannett.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Randy June 27, 2020 / 6:15 pm

      Could a lift run up the cliffs above the Thunder chair, up to top of Sublette. They could be an obstacle in your plan.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Myles Svec June 28, 2020 / 4:30 pm

        Possibly if they did something like peak at whistler.


  3. Gavin June 27, 2020 / 12:47 pm

    A detachable there would be great but is there enough traffic for it? A fixed grip seems more realistic.


  4. Somebody June 28, 2020 / 3:11 pm

    If Jackson were to install a hoback lift, I’d want to see a boundary expansion somewhere. The hobacks are one of the only terrain areas at this point that don’t get skied off in 3 hours after a storm ends. Taking away the powder from the hobacks leaves me with less of a reason to go to Jackson.

    As for Thunder/Sublette, you don’t want to replace those both with one lift. They are two distinctly different pods and should stay separated. Replace Thunder with a HSQ and replace Sublette with a HSQ if wind allows for it.

    Here would be my plan for JHMR (yellow are relevant existing lifts, light blue are replacement lifts, red are new lifts, and dark blue are new connector trails):

    I already went over that I think Thunder/Sub should be upgraded, so we can skip those.

    For a Hoback HSQ, if you wanted it to serve the most terrain possible, you’d start it at the bottom of the current union creek lift. This would also allow for easy access from sweetwater with a new connector trail, which would take pressure off of Bridger, Casper and Thunder.

    As for boundary, the bottom half would be hoback-esque and the top would be similar to Sublette. The hoback lift would really act as a gateway to it, and this lift would definitely be the last one installed in my plan.


    • Myles Svec June 28, 2020 / 4:34 pm

      Who owns that land? If it’s forest service land maybe they would be able to lease it. Plus there is a backcountry area between the Hobacks and your proposed lift. Not sure how steep it is or if it has cliffs on either side but some locals might be mad about it. Plus that’s a pretty big area of land.


      • skitheeast June 28, 2020 / 5:35 pm

        From the image, it appears to be primarily in Bridger-Teton National Forest with the bottom terminal on private land. The area appears to be Rock Springs Canyon, which includes a bowl at the top called Rock Springs Bowl. There is some good backcountry skiing over there, and I am not sure how big any pushback would be from that group.

        The idea itself is interesting. Personally, I view Jackson Hole’s biggest lift problem to be the tram lines, so any idea to spread out skiers has my attention. For example, a Hoback lift encourages tram skiers to come to a relatively underutilized part of the mountain and not head back to the base. A Sublette or Thunder detachable upgrade does the same thing in trying to lure skiers to stay on the upper half of the mountain. If a Rock Springs lift could bring skiers away from the tram, I am onboard.


    • Myles Svec June 28, 2020 / 4:36 pm

      May I also ask what software you use to make those kind of maps? I am interested about it.


      • Somebody June 28, 2020 / 5:28 pm

        I just use google earth and the built in tools. You can draw lines, add pins with names, and see what the slope of a line is.


    • Donald Reif June 28, 2020 / 10:51 pm

      I think I would do all these and rebuild East Ridge, to ensure an alternate way to the Tram summit, in the same way that Marmot functions as an alternate means of reaching the top of the Bridger Gondola.


      • Somebody June 29, 2020 / 2:16 am

        I have mixed feelings about East Ridge. On one hand, Rendezvous and Corbets are fairly short and are not terrain most would lap during the middle of the season. On the other hand, Thunder/Hoback/Sub HSQs might bring more traffic to it, and it could be useful for early/late season ops if they wanted to extend their season.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Billy B July 2, 2020 / 1:38 pm

    Interesting note from the video that I just noticed, at 0:54 it looks like they are lifting a direct drive unit into a UNI-G drive terminal. I previously thought direct drive was only available on D Line systems.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s