Mt. Seymour Proposes Ambitious Expansion

Mt. Seymour could become the largest of Metro Vancouver’s three ski area under a new development plan released this week. Currently the local’s mountain operates just three chairlifts and one surface lift, which could grow to 14 lifts over the coming decades. Seymour lies within Mount Seymour Provincial Park and could increase its footprint from 581 acres to 825 with comfortable carrying capacity rising from 1,717 skiers per day to 4,561. Whistler-based Brent Harley and Associates (BHA) crafted the plan. “We have the potential to expand our winter operation with excellent higher elevation intermediate terrain, mountaintop food and beverage with 360 world-class views, and a little more space for us all to breathe,” wrote Mt. Seymour. “We already carefully control our capacity to avoid overcrowding, but we all need more space.” Potential full buildout could include four new quad chairs, two double chairs and two-T-Bars. Summer offerings would grow significantly with a via ferrata, mountain biking, hiking, zip lines and more.

First could come a new Brockton Chair, which dates back to 1970 and remains one just four Murray-Latta lifts on Earth. Phase 1b also includes nearby Summit and Percy quad chairs, adding intermediate and advanced terrain. “Unique, undulating topography of the slopes will result in remarkably playful and dynamic ski terrain featuring natural bumps, rolls, and banks sought after by experienced skiers,” the plan notes. Summit would be quite long and include an intermediate station about two thirds of the way up. A double chair called Flower and access T-Bar could be built alongside Summit.

Phase three includes a new Ridge chair, located near the former Ridge double chair which stopped operations circa 2008. This fixed quad would service beginner and intermediate progression terrain. “The proximity of this lift to the rental and ski school buildings makes it very accessible to newer skiers and well suited to ski school lessons,” BHA noted. Ridge could also service a future downhill bike park.

A new quad called De Pencier would probably come last, offering a distinctive alpine experience. This phase would also include construction of a Haul Back T-Bar and Exit chair to facilitate egress. The final phase also mentions the possibility of a gondola from the foot of the mountain to the ski area similar to the Blue Grouse Gondola at nearby Grouse Mountain. “Gondolas are increasingly being employed in resort and recreation contexts where onsite parking capacity is limited or where additional vehicles would detract from the desired experience,” BHA noted. “The development of a gondola at MSR would address parking capacity issues at the resort and reduce traffic on Mount Seymour Road.” This high dollar project would need to be studied extensively in partnership with BC Parks.

Mt. Seymour plans to host an open house on June 11th from 4:30 to 7:30 pm at the Parkgate Community Centre. Comments on the plan can also be submitted online.

17 thoughts on “Mt. Seymour Proposes Ambitious Expansion

  1. dougbrownf170641977's avatar dougbrownf170641977 May 28, 2026 / 1:02 pm

    Cool, but expansion terrain would still be low elevation

    Like

  2. dougbrownf170641977's avatar dougbrownf170641977 May 28, 2026 / 1:02 pm

    Cool, but expansion terrain would still be low elevation

    Like

    • Dallylama's avatar Dallylama May 29, 2026 / 9:39 am

      technically goldie lake (Besides ridge which would be more for summer use) would be higher than the top of lodge is now…. not perfect but it’s better. The other option. It closes permanently? You like that option?

      Like

  3. WH2OSHREDDER.'s avatar WH2OSHREDDER. May 28, 2026 / 4:52 pm

    Too bad replacing Brockton. The De Pencier lift is interesting, but I’m not sure of the t-bar’s alignment.

    Like

  4. GearJammer's avatar GearJammer May 28, 2026 / 5:05 pm

    Interesting there was no mention of snowmaking – Seymour is the only local Vancouver hill without. Definitely would be a requirement for the lower elevation lifts – this is partly why the Ridge chair area was abandoned after it was damaged.

    Like

    • WH2OSHREDDER.'s avatar WH2OSHREDDER. May 28, 2026 / 6:35 pm

      Perhaps they simply don’t possess a suitable water source.

      Like

    • Dallylama's avatar Dallylama May 29, 2026 / 9:32 am

      their plan does include additional snowmaking. If you go their site you can read it there.

      Like

  5. LH's avatar LH May 28, 2026 / 8:52 pm

    I think that they would have to really have to have significant summer ops (bike park, hiking & sightseeing tourists) to justify all this investment.

    The winters are going to keep getting shorter, so the amount of ski days (with snow conditions to sell a lot of tickets/passes) to pay off all these lifts might not be adequate by itself.

    Like

    • Cameron Halmrast's avatar Cameron Halmrast May 28, 2026 / 9:22 pm

      I think you nailed it! People don’t want to drive all the way up to Whistler if Seymour can reign in the mountain bike crowd from Vancouver and Northern Washington.

      Like

  6. Liftguy's avatar Liftguy May 28, 2026 / 9:33 pm
    • The Exit Chair is not happening. A quick look on google earth reveals a profile of more than 70°.
    • The Flower Chair seems to get you literally nowhere, and would, if built out, only serve as a way to get to the Summit Chair.
    • The Access T-Bar seems to go downhill at one point??
    • The Summit Chair needs to be detachable.
    • De Pencier lift seems to be a good idea but I am a bit sceptical about what they will do about the De Pencier lake especially in late season.
    • For a plan that says stuff about climate change, where is the snowmaking, and why is Ridge chair being rebuilt?
    • In addition, the entirety of Mt Seymour’s existing terrain faces straight south, and this new expansion also faces south.

    Overall, interesting idea but there is a very little chance of it actually getting built out.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dallylama's avatar Dallylama May 29, 2026 / 9:36 am

      Perhaps read… the ridge would be built to facilitate mountain biking. The winter use would be limited, but would run just fine during the kid lesson season which is what that area is for anyway.

      Like

    • Dallylama's avatar Dallylama May 29, 2026 / 10:21 am

      The lift could absolutely go up a 70 degree grade… it doesn’t have to follow the contour. Could you ski down that face. Doubtful, and an exit lift up it is perfectly doable. Might be a bit scary to ride but doable. My guess the flower chair would serve a terrain park. The season isn’t going past April regardless and anyone that actually skis there knows by spring break it’s pretty much dead up there. All the people screaming the season is too short are just fan boys and not business people. The money is made in the early season, before Valentines Day. Most is in December. If they want long term success they need to be able to sell more tickets in December and January. What happens in March is meaningless. They can’t sell more tickets without more lifts otherwise wait times on mystery would be over an hour…. already in December January its usually about 20 mins. Where as in February it’s about 10 and less than 5 in March on most weekends.

      Like

      • Lachlan Marler's avatar Lachlan Marler June 2, 2026 / 10:05 am

        I hope they do the exit lift because it would look awesome

        Like

  7. Keanan's avatar Keanan May 29, 2026 / 11:16 am

    I rode Mt Seymour a few times about 20 years ago, I’m pretty much a local and know everything about the place. (That’s a joke)

    It is a pretty cool little hill with fun terrain and an amazing view of the city. I had a great time. (That’s true)

    Ridge chair could be helpful to provide additional space for lessons.

    Flower chair and Access t-bar seem pointless.

    Summit chair could go from bottom of proposed Flower chair to top of Brockton and service the same terrain.

    Percy chair could be a little flat at the top of the runs.

    De Pencier chair looks interesting.

    The exit chair seems odd, I wonder if it would work better for the haul back t-bar to be located higher up the hill and stop at the top of Brockton/Summit chairs.

    Like

  8. Eric M's avatar Eric M May 29, 2026 / 8:14 pm

    I skied at Mt Seymour in 1969!

    Like

  9. Don's avatar Don June 1, 2026 / 4:32 pm

    I learnt to ski on Grouse, was Voli Ski Patrol (CSPS) on Seymour for a few years and have skied to the summit many times on skins. Replying to some of the thoughts on here;

    • Ridge can be skied most years at least a little. If it is mainly for bikes then that works. One good thing on Ridge is the bottom is near a hairpin in the road so can be an additional parking lot
    • Brocton is I believe the old PNE chair
    • DePencier lift would be great BUT that terrain is brutal for search and rescue. People will go missing forever every year
    • They have snowmaking but from a small dam. With the constant freeze-thaws water would not be too much of an issue
    • Seasons are getting shorter and shorter and also very unpredictable for the North Shore Mountains. Of the 3 North Shore Mountains, Seymour kind of has the best snow in part because they are slightly higher and also being slightly farther from the ocean (30km???), they seem to get a little less of the warm wet weather.
    • I’m not sure what the community at the base of the road would think of this. They are richer and there might be a ton of NIMBYism
    • My gut feeling is that something like Garabaldi at Squamish would be better as higher and more snow, but that has been in the works since I was in uni in the mid-90s!

    Like

Leave a comment