News Roundup: Setbacks

16 thoughts on “News Roundup: Setbacks

  1. Erik Sahlin's avatar Erik Sahlin June 12, 2026 / 11:21 pm

    Honestly with Park City seriously! Haven’t we just had enough drama at this point? It’s not just the crowds that PC wants to replace Eagle/Silverlode, but also to increase reliability in the PC area, whose infrastructure is more outdated than the Canyons Village. The 6 residents need to know that any lift depreciates over time like other assets and that maintenance costs will only get more expensive to the point where it’ll be more costly than to replace. Also, the 2034 Olympics are coming as well so there’s that.

    Like

    • Ryan G.'s avatar Ryan G. June 12, 2026 / 11:32 pm

      They don’t care about any of that.

      Like

      • Donald Reif's avatar Donald Reif June 12, 2026 / 11:48 pm

        Something something “property values”….

        Like

  2. apresskischool's avatar apresskischool June 13, 2026 / 9:45 am

    Peter (or anyone else) perhaps you could provide some insight to the JH news & guide article about Snow King

    • It says the line has 30 cabins on it already, and that will now go to 38. Doesn’t it only have 24?… and thus going to 32 Cabins
    • It also says that max line capacity is 50 cabins… I can’t imagine there is anywhere near that much room for additional capacity on that line, even before thinking if the motor was upsized to ever grow to that amount

    Like

    • Peter Landsman's avatar Peter Landsman June 13, 2026 / 2:38 pm

      As of today there are 28 on the line and 8 just arrived in the parking lot. So they are going to 36 for now.

      Like

      • apresskischool's avatar apresskischool June 13, 2026 / 11:27 pm

        Did they previously add 4 since install? Or was the sheet just wrong only showing 24, till you updated it today?

        Still think it’s comical they still got the numbers wrong either way.

        Like

        • UnknownUser's avatar UnknownUser June 14, 2026 / 3:52 am

          It’s just a number. No big deal.

          Like

        • Peter Landsman's avatar Peter Landsman June 14, 2026 / 4:56 am

          There were definitely only 24 at the beginning so four got added sometime. I find it amazing they didn’t buy all the cabins for final capacity this round to address local complaints about concert lines. The total redevelopment of Snow King cost tens of millions and 15 more cabins would cost around a million. They spent $5 million on an observatory and Rafferty base improvements ran $15 million. Yet they have this low capacity gondola and crowdfund $75,000 cabins a few at a time through $20 fees.

          Like

        • Peter Landsman's avatar Peter Landsman June 15, 2026 / 2:44 pm

          Ok I checked with LPOA. They ran 24 cabins/1,000 pph at opening, 4 cabins were added in 2023 and 8 more this week. That brings Snow King to about 1,700 pph. Final capacity is 2,100 pph.

          Like

      • apresskischool's avatar apresskischool June 14, 2026 / 12:32 pm

        In the vain of sheet updates, you updated carriers but not capacity.

        Totally agree on the strange allocation of funds, even more so when it’s likely they keep increasing in cost.

        As for “it’s just a number”. – Was more stating it was comical seeing as the newspaper was seemingly receiving information from the mountain manager, and no one seemed to be able to get it right.

        Like

        • Peter Landsman's avatar Peter Landsman June 14, 2026 / 12:35 pm

          I will check with LPOA tomorrow. They originally sent me 1,000 for initial and design capacity, which seems not to be correct.

          Like

  3. Peter Landsman's avatar Peter Landsman June 14, 2026 / 9:10 am

    Side note: I’m aware of an issue on a lot of the lift pages where photos appear stretched out on desktop. Working on it.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Don's avatar Don June 15, 2026 / 10:10 am

    The Canmore Gondi and local opposition is kind of interesting. The MLA for that area is NDP but the provincial government is Conservative, and the manipulative Maple Maga type, who do what they want for their own benefit. Locals are a mix of older rich retired Calgary types who hate any development after they bought in and a good chunk of younger people who live their for the access to Banff and the outdoors. Local opposition will not matter under this government as their electoral base is rural farming types. Long term I do not think it will get built due to environmental reasons and court challenges as well as a good chance the current government will lose the next election, but that is at least a few years away.

    Like

  5. Don's avatar Don June 15, 2026 / 10:19 am

    *”live their for” should be “live there for” – sometimes I English bad …. ;)

    Like

  6. Skiliftfreak's avatar Skiliftfreak June 16, 2026 / 2:11 pm

    I feel like Lift 7 at telluride really isn’t worth an upgrade. Oak street I could see but there isn’t much parking near.

    Like

    • Ryan G.'s avatar Ryan G. June 16, 2026 / 4:50 pm

      7 is definitely due to be replaced regardless, due to age. Its a 1975 SLI. They have the money, might as well replace it with a HSQ given that it’s over 4000ft in length

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment