News Roundup: Short Films

17 thoughts on “News Roundup: Short Films

  1. HoodRacer's avatar HoodRacer January 24, 2025 / 6:43 pm

    RE Mt. Hood Express – in an Instagram comment, Meadows said a 3’ deep chunk of solidified snow/ice slid off the roof of the chair parking structure next to the lower terminal. The snow was extremely dense from melt/refreeze and hit the side of the lower terminal and a carrier while it was detaching from the haul rope.

    Long story short, that chair got stuck, and they were rope evac-ing until maintenance got it dislodged. The day it happened, the lift was on maintenance hold for 2 hours. Later that afternoon, the impacted carrier was parked on the lower parking rail. The carrier damage was visible via webcam (as were the lift maintenance members shoveling the rest of the snow off the roof of the parking structure).

    There is still evidence today that this happened as the paneling of the terminal that was hit with the snow is significantly dented/crunched in. Hope this helps add some color.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Chris's avatar Chris January 25, 2025 / 1:32 pm

      Its odd that buildings in areas with snow and rain don’t have sloped roofs to avoid things getting stuck.

      Like

  2. Tommy Boy's avatar Tommy Boy January 24, 2025 / 6:52 pm

    Thank you Jimmy King. 50 years at Squaw Valley is an incredible run.

    Like

    • Michael's avatar Michael January 31, 2025 / 3:58 pm

      I was a lift operator with Jimmy back in the ’70s. I spent 45 years in the ski industry and retired 7 years ago. Jimmy’s still at it. Drive on, Jimmy!

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Muni's avatar Muni January 24, 2025 / 8:28 pm

    I can’t in good conscience renew my Epic pass without a corporate leadership change at Vail Resorts. The employee housing conditions are just straight up immoral. No heat in the Rockies?! Plus the fact they’d rather disrupt guests’ once-a-year vacations peak season, just for a slim chance to avoid inevitable pay and benefit concessions (that peer resorts have already made).

    There are many ways to increase shareholder value, and eeking out extra margin at the expense of your employees’ health and well-being is probably the dumbest and most short-sighted way to do it.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Ryan G.'s avatar Ryan G. January 25, 2025 / 2:28 am

    good job to the Sugarbush team, it’s not been an easy season for them, but progress has been made. Stay safe.

    Like

  5. Calvin's avatar Calvin January 27, 2025 / 2:14 pm

    in other news… a groomer at Wildcat took out the top lift shack for the Bobcat Triple. Now they have no easy way down with their bunny lift Snowcat Triple broken all season.

    wtf is wrong with Vail?!?

    Like

    • Aussierob's avatar Aussierob January 27, 2025 / 3:53 pm

      Can you explain to me how it’s Vail’s fault if an individual cat driver accidently hits a building?

      Liked by 3 people

      • JS's avatar JS January 27, 2025 / 7:00 pm

        How about the broken lift at WB?

        Like

        • WH2OSHREDDER.'s avatar WH2OSHREDDER. February 1, 2025 / 3:54 pm

          @JS, Glacier is an old lift and breakdowns happen, it’s not Vail’s fault, its just an isolated incident.

          Like

      • Mike B's avatar Mike B January 28, 2025 / 10:33 am

        Well between the Snowcat lift being out now for likely 2 months mid-season and now this incident with Bobcat, the entire looker’s right of the mountain is inaccessible to lower level skiers. Collectively, that very much is Vail’s fault, and they get zero grace from the public at this point b/c of their track record of failure since taking over Wildcat in the first place.

        Like

      • ryand1407's avatar ryand1407 January 30, 2025 / 10:22 pm

        1. Not investing in 1 or more new lifts at Wildcat. Demand has been pretty consistent over the decades for a detachable midway option, whether that be a replacement of one of the triples with a HS4 or 6, or replacing the existing Wildcat HSQ with a gondola or chondola with a mid-station.
        2. Not spending on maintenance to make sure a mountain with 3 lifts doesn’t lose 1/3 of its lifts for the season, making the other 2 absolutely essential.
        3. Possible better training/pay/retention for experienced cat operators or managers to make it really clear to absolutely not risk one of the non-redundant lifts at your mountain with 3 total. I don’t know the details, but I know this doesn’t happen at other mountains often. The fact that it was probably preventable shouldn’t be ignored, and isn’t by well run corporations.

        Like

        • Aussierob's avatar Aussierob January 31, 2025 / 10:44 am

          So,

          1. This has nothing to do with what you perceive Vail should have done. The lift would be operating normally of not hit by a cat.
          2. How do you know they are not spending enough on maintenance? Wild guess probably. Glacier Express at WB will be down for 3 weeks and it had nothing to do with bad/lack of maintenance.
          3. Experience has nothing to do with it. Experienced operators hit stuff. One of our lift shacks was hit by a long tenured grooming manager.

          No one wants this stuff to ever happen, least of all the resort operations team, but it does. Just fix it as quick as you can and move on.

          Liked by 3 people

        • ryand1407's avatar ryand1407 February 3, 2025 / 6:37 am

          I know they’re not spending enough because my resort hires their former employees for more $. They regularly fail to compete for employees. Having the budget and planning to be able to fix problems is good management.

          I can tell you, but not specifically cuz I’m not allowed to, that Vail’s competition has identified their management and budget shortcomings as a competitive edge that has already been gained and now needs to be maintained.

          Like I’m not claiming to know all of Vail’s internals… But when the competition is saying “you suck at this stuff, and we can sell skiing by showing we don’t”… Why would you defend Vail’s strategies? Or at a minimum not question them? Shorting Vail stock has been profitable since before the PCMR strike. Do you deny that, or just not understand why?

          Like

    • Alan B's avatar Alan B January 27, 2025 / 7:45 pm

      Some of their points, strictly from an investor’s perspective, are valid. However: 1) not convinced all changes would necessarily improve skier experience, and 2) it’s all just lip service unless this fund holds a controlling stake in MTN. “Late Apex Partners” does not appear to be a major institutional investor in MTN and as such I see them having little to no sway in changing MTN’s corporate governance or operating practices. They have no online footprint beyond a press release about their MTN position which makes it impossible to quantify their holding size. Beyond responding to some unwanted media attention (which there seems to be a lot of), MTN has no obligation to do anything about this release.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Calvin Cancel reply